![]() While he wouldn’t take ignoring Kacsmaryk’s ruling off the table if the situation became extreme enough, he pointed out that there is another, better option.Įnforcement discretion is a decades-old practice established by a 1985 Supreme Court case that determined administrative agencies can decide when to enforce their own rules, based on which offenses are the most important to target. “Ignoring court rulings is a very serious thing that undermines basic principles of law,” David Cohen, a professor at Drexel University’s Kline School of Law, told The New Republic. That is the FDA’s decision.” /wGJBunurcL- Kaitlan Collins April 10, 2023īut law experts warn against urging the government to “ignore” the ruling, which has no legal precedent. Whether you agree with its usage or not, that's not your decision. Republican says she believes the FDA should ignore the Texas judge’s ruling. They explained that the “subject matter addressed by the song’s lyrics” was not in line with the “the age and maturity level of the students.” ![]() ![]() Piacsek and Sebert claim they only reviewed and upheld decisions made by Heyer’s staff.īut members of AEW argue the officials are blaming school staff for a broader chilling atmosphere in the district that is being conducted, namely through the advancement of policies like 2240.Ĭuriously, Piascek and Sebert, while insisting they were not involved in the decision to ban the song, took it upon themselves to explain the exact rationale of why it was banned. Jim Sebert have insisted that they did not “insert themselves into the song selection.” Rather, they framed the process as decisions made by Heyer Principal Mark Schneider and the school’s music teacher. The school principal and another school administrator reviewed the song and decided that it “could be deemed controversial” in relation to Board Policy 2240. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |